Select a State:

Judicial Selection in the States

News

New Hampshire s judicial selection process is unique to itself and Massachusetts (and formerly Maine): judicial nominations are made by the governor and confirmed by...

Read More...

Amid the debate on SB 4 today and the decision to switch North Carolina s Supreme Court and Court of Appeals from nonpartisan to partisan...

Read More...

I mentioned that there was speculation that the special session called by NC s governor to deal with Hurricane Matthew relief might turn into an...

Read More...

In recent years, proposals have been introduced by legislators, governors, courts, and citizens' groups in nearly every state to limit the role of politics in the selection of state judges.

The extent of these activities underscores the recognition that an independent judiciary is essential to the maintenance of public trust and confidence in the court system.

The American Judicature Society, through funding from the Open Society Institute, has contributed to these efforts by compiling comprehensive information on judicial selection processes in each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Topics covered include methods of selecting, retaining, and removing of judges; successful and unsuccessful reform efforts; the roles of parties, interest groups, and professional organizations in selecting judges; and the diversity of the bench.

  • To view state-specific information, select a state from the drop-down menu in the upper right or from the map below.
  • To view practices among states, select a topic on the left.