Friday, December 13, 2024
HomeLawsuitsLifeWave Lawsuit: Are Non-Transdermal Patches Good?

LifeWave Lawsuit: Are Non-Transdermal Patches Good?

-

LifeWave is a patented life technology company that stirs up strong opinions among skeptics and supporters. The products offer alternative options to pharmaceuticals and other serious medical interventions. However, the company has some doubts about its products regarding their efficacy and because of its marketing tactics. In this article, we will talk about the LifeWave lawsuit.

Lifewave Company

Lifewave is famous for its non-transdermal patches. It started in 2004, and David Schmidt owns it. The website claims, ‘ Lifewave wants to help people live well’ by using special wellness solutions. The company makes skin creams, sprays, and patches that stick to the skin.

The company benefits from some celebrity endorsements. Suzanne Somers started in TV roles where she played a role for holistic health and was an ambassador for the company before she passed away in October 2023. The company has drawn its share of skeptics, including regarding the efficacy of its products and its marketing tactics.

LifeWave Lawsuit

Phototherapy Technique By LifeWave

The advertisement for Life Wave states that non-transdermal patches restore natural energy by using phototherapy to stimulate the skin with specific wavelengths of light.

These wavelengths enhance stem cells and repair tissues. These wavelengths of light improve peptides, such as the X-39 patch, improving the peptide GHK-Cu, also known as short chains of amino acids.

Lifewave explains, ‘These patches are designed to trap the infrared energy. When these reflect on the body, it stimulates specific points on the skin that promote a general state of health and uniqueness of each non-transdermal patch.’

These are small, circular patches, which many people find appealing as a holistic option because they are free from pharmaceuticals.

Are Lifewave Products Good?

According to the research of  National Library of Medicine (2015), holistic approaches to well-being and medicine appeal to many people. However, empirical research on the effectiveness of biofield therapies has future potential.

The experimental study was conducted in India on the specific wavelength X-39 non-transdermal patches. This study also recommended that further research be conducted using double-blinded placebo trials.

In addition, the research found that the X-39 patch has many benefits, such as improving overall energy, providing rapid relief, and improving the body’s functional vitality.

On the other hand, these patches are not approved by the FDA as medical devices; therefore, the FDA issued a general warning on stem cell therapy.

Meanwhile, though, LifeWave patches are not FDA-approved medical devices. The FDA has issued a general warning on stem cell therapy, stating that “unproven stem cell treatments can be unsafe” and urging consumers to get all of the facts about any treatment they may be considering.

Separate from the efficacy of LifeWave patches and other products that give some people pause surrounding the company is its use of multi-level marketing. It explains that businesses that involve selling products to family and friends and then recommending other people to do the same are called multi-level marketing or direct marketing businesses, including those in the health and wellness industry.

LifeWave Lawsuit

LifeWave Lawsuit

The company has been involved in many lawsuits over the years. LifeWave was the Defendant in 2015. Once, LifeWave Europe was penalized in 2014 for under-declaring Corporate Tax and VAT. Once, the company was sued by Jeuesse, LLC, a multi-level marketing competitor, but the case was settled in 2015. Everyone asks about all these LifeWave Lawsuits which the company has defended successfully.

Read also: Gardasil Lawsuit

Bottom Line

There is no LifeWave patches lawsuit, but potential customers have mixed reviews about the company’s benefits, which persist in their products. Further, studies clarify happy customers benefit from a placebo effect or concrete science related to the purported phototherapy process; meanwhile, customers must know the FDA’s advice and should conduct their research on products.

Faheem Haydar
Faheem Haydar
Faheem Haydar is a blogger with over 10+ years of experience in covering legal topics. His background in business strengthens up his analysis of legal issues in real time. But keep in mind that his writings provide easy to grasp legal information, not legal advice.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read